Welcome to the Toyota GT 86 / Scion FR-S / Subaru BRZ Community Forums | Toyobaru.net.

View Poll Results: Which optional engine should Toyota offer?

Voters
54. You may not vote on this poll
  • None

    3 5.56%
  • RWD version of the EJ25 (turbo boxer)

    44 81.48%
  • 2GR-FSE (V6 from Lexus IS350)

    7 12.96%
Results 1 to 25 of 25
  1. #1
    Модератор
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Springfield, MA
    Age
    22
    Posts
    1,398

    Optional engine?

    Should Toyota also offer a more powerful engine for the FT-086a??
    05' STi
    Team Scoobie Member

  2. #2
    Lord of the Wings
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Shadow Complex
    Age
    32
    Posts
    442
    I don't want this car to have a V6 actually. It'll make it more expensive, and heavier. I want this thing to be light, well balanced and not a high HP car stock. If I wanted a RWD coupe with a V6 I'd just get a 370z.

  3. #3
    Toyobaruator
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Age
    31
    Posts
    1,897
    Yea, the thing I like about the use of the boxer is it's ability to add some center of gravity benifits. I'd take a modern 2jz though

  4. #4
    Модератор
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Springfield, MA
    Age
    22
    Posts
    1,398
    Quote Originally Posted by West View Post
    I'd take a modern 2jz though
    yeah, that's what i was kinda thinkin i guess
    05' STi
    Team Scoobie Member

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    234
    Would like to see this with a 2ZZ-GE with the ECU from Lotus, but that is just a dream.

  6. #6
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fort Wayne, Indiana
    Posts
    4
    I think the EJ25 turbo would have enough power but it would be kinda cool to see the 3.0 twin turbo engine that they have over in japan

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    SGV
    Age
    37
    Posts
    117
    Turbo Boxer get my vote!

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    42
    Posts
    263
    The FT-86 is to come with a 2.0L, what benefit will a 2.5L boxer give it? I don't believe much; even worth as an option. Toyota should work out a power plant that's light and a minimum of 3.0L w/ D4 injection for an engine option. Just a thought.

  9. #9
    Модератор
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Springfield, MA
    Age
    22
    Posts
    1,398
    Quote Originally Posted by G4BROKE View Post
    The FT-86 is to come with a 2.0L, what benefit will a 2.5L boxer give it? I don't believe much; even worth as an option. Toyota should work out a power plant that's light and a minimum of 3.0L w/ D4 injection for an engine option. Just a thought.
    the 2.5L i was referring to was obviously the ej25... and while JDM 2.0Ls may have some benefits, the 2.5L does have room for potential
    the only reason they kept it 2.0L in the first place was to meet WRC specs


    lol, and apparently im the only person who would be a fan of a 2GR-FSE option, not that i dont like boxers... i have one myself
    05' STi
    Team Scoobie Member

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    42
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by ej25ti View Post
    the 2.5L i was referring to was obviously the ej25... and while JDM 2.0Ls may have some benefits, the 2.5L does have room for potential
    the only reason they kept it 2.0L in the first place was to meet WRC specs
    lol, and apparently im the only person who would be a fan of a 2GR-FSE option, not that i dont like boxers... i have one myself
    Just saying 2.0L H4 => 2.5L H4, not really big change.... Say 2.0L H4 => 3.3L H6, yeah sure... or 2.5L H4 => 3.6L H6........and these already for Subarus. Just believe engine option should be a larger significants to power etc.

    Wouldn't mind the 2GR-FSE but the FT-86 is gonna be small right? Guess we'll eventually see what the ultimate plan will be.


    Meanwhile....power from 2.0L H4 (if seen before ignore - a bit old)

    Roger Clark Motorsports

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUCBxRdadMc&feature=player_embedded

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8Cz_krJ1iI&feature=player_embedded

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    SGV
    Age
    37
    Posts
    117
    Man for some reason I don't care about the engine I just want this beast out of the production lol!!! This FT or E is very sex!!

    Toyota Supra '95 5Speed N/A TargaTop LemansBlue

  12. #12
    Модератор
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Springfield, MA
    Age
    22
    Posts
    1,398
    Quote Originally Posted by G4BROKE View Post
    Just saying 2.0L H4 => 2.5L H4, not really big change.... Say 2.0L H4 => 3.3L H6, yeah sure... or 2.5L H4 => 3.6L H6........and these already for Subarus. Just believe engine option should be a larger significants to power etc.
    I wasn't trying to say that 2.5Ls are better than 2.0Ls.
    What I was basically trying to ask is would you rather have an EJ253 or an EJ257??
    ...
    lol that's what i thought
    05' STi
    Team Scoobie Member

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    42
    Posts
    263
    Quote Originally Posted by ej25ti View Post
    I wasn't trying to say that 2.5Ls are better than 2.0Ls.
    What I was basically trying to ask is would you rather have an EJ253 or an EJ257??
    ...
    lol that's what i thought
    Well...that just changes everything...surely things are awry.

    Я думаю, нам больше ничего не надо комментировать.

  14. #14
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    14
    hell yeah! they should offer something with V-TAKKKK

  15. #15
    Модератор
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Springfield, MA
    Age
    22
    Posts
    1,398
    Quote Originally Posted by G4BROKE View Post
    Well...that just changes everything...surely things are awry.

    Я думаю, нам больше ничего не надо комментировать.
    haha, navernoe

    lol leave me alone im bored



    Quote Originally Posted by burninskulls0911 View Post
    hell yeah! they should offer something with V-TAKKKK
    obviously!!
    05' STi
    Team Scoobie Member

  16. #16
    Toyobaruator
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Age
    31
    Posts
    1,897
    Just give me a 2.0l Turbo, Ill take it from there. The 2.5 would be nice for NA though.

    All I hope for is an engine that isn't overly controlled by the ECU, the Celica was notorious for this. You could add mods and such to the little 1.8 VVT-i and it would auto adjust and null most gains. Or at least the motor was so precisely tuned that no significant gain could be achieved.

    While I think engine swaps will be a big possibility for the FT-86, we wont have many crazy options due to the small bay. Then again, money buys all.

  17. #17
    Модератор
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Springfield, MA
    Age
    22
    Posts
    1,398
    WELL
    until recently i was all only for the subie version...
    but i was thinking last night how cool it would be to have the first 2jz gte toyota ft86
    ... so
    hmm lol
    05' STi
    Team Scoobie Member

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    234
    I think the engine bay will be too short for any form of 6 cylinder engine, but if its wide enough for a boxer 4, I would love to slot a supercharged 1,2 or 3UZ in there instead...(can someone say, 'lead tipped arrow')?

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    151
    I say just put a snail option on the 2.0. Nothing crazy. Just something good for 40-50 horses.

  20. #20
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    5
    2GR. ftw.
    Boxter RWD would get pricey

  21. #21
    Newbie
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    26
    I can almost guarantee that certain shops will have an EJ25/20 swapped into one of these cars within hours of getting their hands on one. AFAIK the bellhousing pattern is the same on the FB engines as it is on the EJ series, so weld up a custom exhaust manifold, downpipe, and call it a day. heck, I'm considering purchasing a spare JDM ej207, doing a light build, and having it ready for when I get bored of driving this N/A.

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    STL
    Age
    27
    Posts
    513
    Quote Originally Posted by MrVito View Post
    I can almost guarantee that certain shops will have an EJ25/20 swapped into one of these cars within hours of getting their hands on one. AFAIK the bellhousing pattern is the same on the FB engines as it is on the EJ series, so weld up a custom exhaust manifold, downpipe, and call it a day. heck, I'm considering purchasing a spare JDM ej207, doing a light build, and having it ready for when I get bored of driving this N/A.
    ^i like your thinking!

    or just save some cash for some cheaper off the shelf units. i bet hks, cobb, etc. will have stuff for these cars within months of release.

    me, i'm hoping there is a t3 footprinted turbo option that i'll upgrade after being out of warranty.

    ra23celcia> why a 2zz? they are weak. no torque, hard to mod and not as durable as the boxers. if anything, i would love to see a hardcore turbo model from the fb20 or fb25.

    anyone who wants a v engine in this is going to mess up it's handling. that or an inline four will throw it off. you don't need alot of torque in a sub 3000 lb car either. more likely to burn rubber than go anywhere, unless you run some huge/sticky tires. I'd prefer a mix of turbo and high rpm na power. 8K redline and 12-15 lbs of boost will make for some fun!
    91 hardtop mr2 turbo

  23. #23
    Модератор
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Springfield, MA
    Age
    22
    Posts
    1,398
    Quote Originally Posted by modifiedMR View Post
    ^i like your thinking!

    or just save some cash for some cheaper off the shelf units. i bet hks, cobb, etc. will have stuff for these cars within months of release.

    me, i'm hoping there is a t3 footprinted turbo option that i'll upgrade after being out of warranty.

    ra23celcia> why a 2zz? they are weak. no torque, hard to mod and not as durable as the boxers. if anything, i would love to see a hardcore turbo model from the fb20 or fb25.

    anyone who wants a v engine in this is going to mess up it's handling. that or an inline four will throw it off. you don't need alot of torque in a sub 3000 lb car either. more likely to burn rubber than go anywhere, unless you run some huge/sticky tires. I'd prefer a mix of turbo and high rpm na power. 8K redline and 12-15 lbs of boost will make for some fun!
    minus HKS, at least for the american model lol
    05' STi
    Team Scoobie Member

  24. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    293
    Initially i thought that the 2.0L was too weak, but after looking at the tricked out Hyabusa engineSmart for two, i remember the fancy phrase ,"power to weight ratio".

  25. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    STL
    Age
    27
    Posts
    513
    yeah, 2 liters are weak........

    YouTube - ‪MR2liter 2step and some bullshit pulls. - Car Videos on StreetFire.flv‬‏

    YouTube - ‪T88 MR2liter 1st time to the track‬‏

    just a regular impreza? hahaha. 2.0 L of fury......
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUCBxRdadMc

    http://www.streetfire.net/video/TIME...0HP_193091.htm

    AWD cars, the only cars where going off road might help make lap times shorter. lol

    I'll take a 2.0L turbo FB engine please.
    Last edited by modifiedMR; 05-25-2011 at 11:44 AM.
    91 hardtop mr2 turbo

 

 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0